INBOX
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ❘ RICHARD BAER
The GC of Qwest Communications explains why he isn’t switching to alternative fee deals.
KEEP YOUR CHANGE
BY AMY MILLER
RICHARD BAER, GENERAL COUNSEL OF QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DIDN’T GET THE MEMO.
Practically everyone in the in-house bar seems to think that alternative fee arrangements are the future
of the legal marketplace. Baer, however, doesn’t. At a December conference in New York, he said that
trashing the billable hour hadn’t worked out for Qwest. In fact, he said, “alternative fee arrangements
have been a colossal train wreck for us.”
At Corporate Counsel we’ve been impressed with Baer and his department—so much so that Qwest
won our Best Legal Department competition two years ago. So we were curious to hear more from him.
In a follow-up interview with staff reporter Amy Miller, Baer explained why he thinks that billing by
the hour will—and should—continue. An edited version of their conversation follows.
>>>
Q: Why haven’t alternative fee arrangements worked out for Qwest?
A: The first issue is, everyone these days
hates the hourly billing arrangement.
They say it gives incentives for outside
lawyers to bill as many hours as possible. And we can’t debate that—we can’t
say that this doesn’t create misalignment
between clients and outside counsel.
But we actually don’t think it’s as
big an issue as people make it out to be.
Really great lawyers aren’t trying to bill
as many hours as they can to maximize
their profits. They want to get retained
again and again in the future—and the
only way to do that is to deliver great
value.
Q: What’s the second issue?
A: Fixed fees just create a different misalignment. If you set up a fixed-fee deal
with a law firm, then the misalignment
is caused because the firm wants to
do as little as possible to maximize its
profit margins. Or else they will use
people who may not be qualified to do
the work.
Outside counsel are also going to be
motivated to resolve cases quickly, to
increase their profit margins. That may
be good for the client, and it may not be
good for the client. In order to settle a
case early, I may end up having to pay
more than if we waited.
And I’m concerned about where
they’re going to cut corners in order to
maximize their margins. I don’t know
necessarily where they are cutting corners. I just know that they are.
Q: What have you used alternative fees
for in the past?
A: Our employment cases, because we
had a high volume, and they were similar in scope and issues. So we could
come up with a better sense what they
should cost. Fixed fees only work if you
know what the hourly rate is going to
be—you have to have a price point to
compare to.
Q: And after that experience, you
decided not to use a fixed fee for other
types of cases?
A: Yes. About 70 percent of our legal
spending is on large, complex litigation.
And we don’t know what those cases
should cost because they are all so different. Once you get into these complicated
matters, they can be all over the map.
Q: So now you’ve stopped using alternative fees altogether. Are you pleased
with that decision?
A: Yes. We are very active in our management of cases. If we make strategic
decisions up front, we feel we can actually achieve significant savings. We work
closely with outside counsel to make cost-benefit decisions, such as we’re not going
to depose the sixth person at a meeting,
or we’re not going to review with lawyers these categories of documents.
And then we also have cut costs
through technology. We unbundle a lot
of the work firms do for us and give it to
contractors that provide legal services,
then apply technology to get that work
done more efficiently and at a much
lower cost.
Q: Has the strategy paid off?
A: We’ve been able to reduce our legal
costs about 10 percent from 2008 to 2009.
Q: You’ve participated in panel discussions recently with some strong supporters of alternative billing arrangements,
such as Jeffrey Carr, general counsel of
FMC Technologies, Inc. They’re pretty
persuasive. Have they been able to
change your mind at all?
A: I’ve got the utmost respect for Jeff—
he’s doing some terrific things. But I have
not yet been convinced that alternative
fee arrangements would work for us.
Q: So what’s the future of the billable
hour?
A: I think it’s going to be around a heck
of a lot longer than people think. ■