IP INSIDER
LESSONS OF THE PATENT TROLL TRACKER
Two years af Ter richard frenkel—a T
the time an in-house Cisco Systems,
Inc., lawyer and now of counsel at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati—outed
himself as the until-then-anonymous
author of the controversial patent litigation blog, the Patent Troll Tracker saga
appears to be over.
In January a libel suit filed by East
Texas lawyer T. John “Johnny” Ward,
Jr., against Cisco over the contents of an
October 2007 Troll Tracker post was settled under confidential terms. Frenkel—
dismissed as a defendant in the case last
August at Ward’s request—has declined
to comment on either Ward’s suit or a
second, related defamation claim filed
against him and Cisco by East Texas
lawyer Eric Albritton. (That suit settled
in September after a weeklong trial.)
While it’s clear now that at least a
few high-level Cisco employees knew
the Troll Tracker’s identity, company
lawyers say no one there besides Fren-
kel contributed to the blog. Still, because
Cisco is helping to lead the lobbying
charge in favor of reforming the nation’s
patent laws—with a particular focus on
lowering litigation payouts to nonprac-
ticing entities (a.k.a. “NPEs,” or “patent
trolls”)—those who advocate for small
patent holders sensed a Frenkel-Cisco
conspiracy.
“Pa Ten T Trolling” has i Ts rewards.
Tech-sector executives and lawyers say
privately—and an informed review of
court dockets confirms—that so-called
trolls aren’t just surviving, they’re thriv-
ing. The essential
NPE tactic—suing
a broad swath of
companies for patent infringement,
then settling with
each defendant for
less than the cost
of fighting such
a suit—is now an
established business model. It’s so solid,
in fact, that patent holders are starting
to delve into previously untouched economic sectors, suing small retailers and
even photographers.
Richard Frenkel
One statistic in the PwC study that
supports this trend: Since 2002, NPEs
have consistently won larger damage
awards than operating companies [see
chart next page]. That suggests that NPE
lawyers are learning new techniques for
maximizing payouts, says one of the
study’s authors, forensic accountant
Chris Barry.
IP & Complex Litigation
• Patent, copyright and trademark infringement
• Misappropriation of trade secrets
• Intellectual property contract disputes
• Technology-related litigation
Protect what's yours. Contact us today.
www.cantorcolburn.com
Hartford, CT
860.286.2929
Washington, D.C.
703.236.4500
Atlanta, GA
404.607.9991
Detroit, MI
248.524.2300
Managing Partners: Michael A. Cantor and Philmore H. Colburn II